Home › Forums › Mergers & Acquisitions › Have you seen any M&A deals follow a “text book” pattern?
Tagged: IMO
- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 31, 2021 at 7:36 pm #52237
Anonymous
InactiveWhen I was new to the M&A world, I studied information from various experts in the M&A field. Since then and many M&As later, I haven’t seen ANY that follow a standard process. I think it is because of the human factor. What do you think?
February 6, 2022 at 8:14 am #55782Anonymous
InactiveI think every M&A transaction is a unique one. The “text book” pattern is described by M&A professionals based on the many M&A cases that they have experienced and hence serves as a very generic reference for a typical M&A process. Even transactions that are similar in many aspects will definitely have something different from the rest.
February 9, 2022 at 7:11 pm #56150Anonymous
InactiveYanxuan, great insight. Thank you!
February 19, 2022 at 9:09 am #56378Anonymous
InactiveI think it’s difficult for the M&A deals following a text book pattern as each deal is unique and there are a lot of factors to consider. I think following the text book pattern might not always be the most effective and efficient way to close the deal. I would refer the text book pattern as a reference but not necessary to follow each step. Thanks.
February 22, 2022 at 4:21 am #56430Anonymous
InactiveI agree it would be difficult for M&A to follow a textbook approach, but in the the deals I’ve participated in, the level of experience and expertise is limited. For example, in the integrations I’ve participated in, the IMO lead and key team members don’t have specific credentials or training related to M&A. It surprises me given the stakes are so high, but typically its a well regarded internal leader at mid to senior level with good knowledge of the acquiring business and culture with some project management skill. I would think that formal training and credentials would be a requirement to lead such important work, or to be a decision maker in the purchase decision.
February 24, 2022 at 10:22 pm #56510Anonymous
InactivePo Huang, Thank you for your insights. Yes, textbook models are a helpful resource but not a specific map.
February 24, 2022 at 10:30 pm #56511Anonymous
InactiveAmanda Broos, we have similar reactions when we see IMO leads and team members not experienced, skilled, or trained in M&A integrations. So often, senior leaders see the IMO leadership and team participation as an add-on training opportunity for employees and offer limited expert coaching or guidance. Most of the time, I’ve seen the IMO roles added onto the team member’s full-time business-as-usual responsibilities. Little wonder integrations can be extra challenging.
February 26, 2022 at 9:06 pm #56566Anonymous
InactiveKaren, that’s been my reaction too. Similar observations to yours, and I totally agree. While I’m always supportive of providing training opportunities, its a very expensive learning experience… and can be painful for all involved!
March 15, 2022 at 12:59 am #57463Anonymous
InactiveI think that there are some fundamentals that can be used on each M&A project that will help it be successful (ie project management skills, good communication skills, due diligence etc…) However I have never seen a textbook integration due to the unique nature of each project. What I have seen is a striving for continuous improvement in getting better organized, more planning ahead of time, enhancement of communications etc.. although each one we do we get better, in each there are unique challenges to work out and new problems to solve.
May 24, 2025 at 1:27 am #141274Anonymous
InactiveYou’re absolutely right. there is no one-size-fits-all M&A. Every Deal Has Unique Stakeholders and each with their own motivations, fears, and ambitions. Sometimes beyond numbers, M&A is about trust, culture fit, and vision alignment. A deal might make perfect strategic sense on paper but fall apart because of cultural mismatches or leadership clashes. Experienced dealmakers know that while frameworks and checklists are helpful, flexibility is essential.
May 26, 2025 at 9:31 pm #141339Anonymous
InactiveThis post presents an interesting exchange of ideas and experiences, and my perspective aligns with those shared by other responders. Two key points stand out: while training may not be strictly necessary, it is unquestionably beneficial in ensuring a more successful and effective M&A deal. Additionally, every deal comes with its own unique circumstances, requiring a certain level of adjustment and creativity to apply best practices effectively.
May 28, 2025 at 2:30 pm #141412Anonymous
InactiveI agree with the previous posts, I do not think there is a “text book” pattern because every situation is different. However, I do think there are “best practices” on how to handle specific items related to a deal.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.